Indian hegemony in Nepal remains intact since 1950: Ram Hari Joshi

Ram Hari Joshi

Senior Leader, Nepali Congres

The Nepali Congress led the 1950 movement for a political change. But the benefit of that went into the pockets of the then King and the Ranas. As per the wishes of India, the revolution was made to land in a compromise. The tripartite agreement was made to favor the Indian interests. When the King went in exile in Delhi, India wanted to maneuver the upcoming Nepal political changes for its advantage. In the process, India kept King Tribhuwan in its firm grip. Concluding that if the Nepali revolution for the political change prolonged then that would not be in the larger interest of the Indian regime thus India instantly brought the King, the Ranas and the Nepali Congress together and managed a tripartite agreement between these three forces. The then Indian Ambassador to Nepal, C.P. N Sinha played a crucial role in managing this tripartite agreement. The Indian Prime Minister Nehru too used to work as per the suggestions of Ambassador Sinha. Sinha has a tremendous role in the institutionalization of the Indian influence in Nepali politics.

Since then, the Indian hegemony in Nepal remains intact.

B. P was not in favor of the agreement to be signed in Delhi, however, he had to comply with the decision when Matrika Prasad Koirala Okayed the Indian decision.

The revolution was not waged just to restore King Tribhuwan to power and for making Mohan Shumsher the country’s Prime Minister.

-Ram Hari Joshi, Senior Leader, Nepali Congress.

Naya Patrika Daily dated November 27, 2011. 

Post your Comment here

TERMS OF USE:The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any persons) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).


  •         
  •          





  •  
I agree

Comments

  • Posted on - 2012-04-05    by     Garib Nepali tara Thulo Aatma
  • Nepal muluk lai MAYA garne Nepali ra Nepali samaj lai MAYA garne Nepali aaja samma NEPAL ma dekhiiana! Sano ya thulo KURA yahi ho. Yo Nepali Congress ko kunai pani MEMBERS chapa ma dekhada NEPAL muluk lai pahilo Tahas-Nahash parne Nepal ko lagi darlagdo DAKA haru jasto lagchha!
  • Posted on - 2012-04-05    by     1990/2047
  • This bloody Nepali Congress is a main party to DESTROYED the beautiful your and our country NEPAL.
  • Posted on - 2011-12-05    by     Gopal Thapa
  • The comments are nothing new and surprising ; there is no point repeating what has already been said by late B.P Koirala himself. What is puzzling instead is the inability of our politicians in power not to have learnt lessons as of now. It is obvious that big and powerful countries may have multiple of interests to promote. It is for us, as weak and small, to decide prudently how we can safeguard our national interests without prejudice to those of India, or China. International trust can be gained only when we succeed to pursue a consensus foreign policy which is balanced,informed and credible .