While the Unified Maoists’ Party leaders threaten their detractors to make their fate similar to Nepal’s last Monarch Gyanendra Shah for not accepting their demands, there are some leaders who even claim that the Maoists’ Party was the brainchild of the former Royalties and it was taking on the course traced by the Former King(s).

“I see no difference between Former King Gyanendra and Prachanda”, commented Mr. Narayan man Bijukche Rohit, the chairman of the Nepal Majdoor Kisan Party.

Mr. Rohit was addressing a program organized by his party in Gaur of Rautahat District, November 11, 2009.

Mr. Rohit who is always considered as someone who have had close relations with Nepal’s Former King Gyanendra Shah, surprisingly claimed that Prachanda’s avowals are in some way or the other very similar to the now sidelined King.

“He is adopting the same path traced by King Gyanendra to grab power”, claimed Bijukche.

One of the senior leaders of the Nepali Congress Party, Ram Chandra Poudel has repeatedly claimed that the Unified Maoists Party was the brainchild of Gyanendra Shah and Prachanda a follower of Late King Mahendra Bir Bikram Shah.

King Mahendra, father of Nepal’s last King Gyanendra Shah amid chaos and uncertainty in the country and repeated failure of the democratically elected government then, to restore normalcy in the country had imposed a coup d’état December 1960, with the blessings of the Indian and the Chinese regime.

However, analysts claim that Nepal’s political actors who still make Gyanendra Shah a topic of their discussion, whether it is while addressing a rally or at a debate program, have kept the monarchy alive in the minds of the people.

Mr. Bijukche also claimed that the Unified Maoists’ Party has so far failed to justify its role as the main opposition party of the country.

Comments (3)

let's make kamred Bijukche the king ... ohoo, shree panch maharajadhiraj Bijukche .. you like that roHIT?

Commented by wpoql - November 12, 2009 @ 5:09 PM

If monarchical institution was not establish there will no any political party leaders like Bijukchhe and so on. In this way people weant restablish the monarchical institution but political party leaders are more supreamacy than people. If Nepal is a democratic country people should have right to give verdict over monarchical institution. Still majority prople have believe monarchical institution is needed.

Commented by Karan - November 12, 2009 @ 12:32 PM

in a debate mr. rohit is right because we as an educated and well stablished nepali citizen don't think there are so many problems in Nepal. we have everything but peace in mind and willingness in heart is lac. i don't thnik there is any impossibilities in nepal for development or neither lac of money to do some noble developments in the country. our political animals have no brain at all and after so many years of unstability still they did not understand where are we going? we are progressing towards our brighter future or dragging future to the 1700 AD barberian era? Recently reaveled by NRN that more than 2500000 Professional Nepalese are working outside of Nepal and think if we can get a dollar a month from them for the development of our country, each month we can bring 187 Million Rupees to the country each month. Don't you think we can develop our all 75 district from this money in 5 years? its a very simple and effortless example that how noble thought and noble mind could think of a develped, peaceful and progressive nation ahead. As concerning to Mr. Rohit he is also a furstated ...d who always criticise others and never attempt to do his own. in various cases he always had a different views and it was always drived to negetive way.He never co oped with other animals and blamming others is not the way to a j0b to done. Finding a permanent solution may make him a hero. after all let those poor people of nepal to suffer till they tired and wakeup from their day dream.

Commented by name a man - November 11, 2009 @ 10:43 PM

Post Your Comment

* Name
* E-Mail
*
* Security code
* Comment