The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) that continues to lose peoples’ support, as indicated by fresh local election results in India, has said that for the timely drafting of the constitution and logical conclusion of the peace process in Nepal, the support of the Unified Maoists’ Party was crucial.

The BJP that is being taken as a fading political force in India’s politics has however, urged the Unified Maoists to withdraw its declared protest programs for the overall unity and institutionalizing peace in Nepal.

Reports coming all the way from New Delhi, where Jhal Nath Khanal, the United Marxist Leninists Chairman is currently visiting, have it that the BJP leaders upon meeting Mr. Khanal had made these remarks.

Khanal met with BJP President Raj Nath Singh, General Secretary Mr. Arun Jaitly and senior leader Mr. Murli Manohar Joshi on Saturday November 7, 2009.

More interestingly, Mr. Khanal met with Dr. Karan Singh, who is the Foreign Affairs Advisor to Smt. Sonia Gandhi, the Chairwoman of the Indian National Congress Party, the party leading the central government.

Dr. Singh is also the close relative of Nepal’s last King Gyanendra Shah.

“Dr. Singh advised Mr. Khanal to move ahead with National consensus”, reports reveal.

However, the most intriguing part of the ongoing India trips of the Nepali leaders being held one after another, is their meeting with the Indian National Security Advisor M.K. Narayanan.

Khanal also met Mr. Narayanan on Saturday, November 7, 2009.

What is the need to meet Mr. Narayanan and what sort of information are being exchanged during the meeting remains yet a mystery?

Is it that Mr. Narayanan relies heavily on Nepali leadership to devise India’s National Security policy?

Or, could also be that leaders of the likes of Khanal who pose to be of the China-bend are valued heavily by the Indian regime? Information of China is being supplied. Could be?

Comments (3)

What the hell are you talking about? Headlines read "BJP urges Nepal Maoist to withdraw protests" and report starts with "The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) that continues to lose peoples’ support, as indicated by fresh local election results in India", and the article continue with "The BJP that is being taken as a fading political force in India’s politics". Conclude with "Is it that Mr. Narayanan relies heavily on Nepali leadership to devise India’s National Security policy? Or, could also be that leaders of the likes of Khanal who pose to be of the China-bend are valued heavily by the Indian regime? Information of China is being supplied. Could be? I find the writer is over smart to prove himself a idiot of the day.

Commented by Nirmal - November 9, 2009 @ 11:46 AM

hogwash... nothing more.

Commented by apwl - November 8, 2009 @ 3:17 PM

absolutely ture khanal is not a security expert and he is not a high ranking security offcial of Nepal so what is the need to meet narayanan?

Commented by kalu - November 8, 2009 @ 8:38 AM

Post Your Comment

* Name
* E-Mail
*
* Security code
* Comment