Nepal Monarchy revived in various forms: Maoist leader
Mohan Baidya Kiran, the United Maoist Party Senior leader and the ideological mentor of Prachanda has opined that the dictatorial 240 years old Royal Regime has re-emerged in another form.
While claiming that foreign interference was at its peak, Kiran said that the Maoists party in the immediate future need to be more alert and take strong measures to save the country.
Mr. Kiran was making his views public at a book launching ceremony in
“Army, Police, Judiciary and administration-all together make a Nation-State, unless and until we have total control over all these components of the State, we can not implement our programs and policies”, added Kiran.
Criticizing the UML said Kiran, “The UML has betrayed us and has landed in the Rightist Front”, and added, “The UML no longer has the moral right to claim itself as a communist party”.
Similarly, Krishna Bahadur Mahara, another Maoists leader and the Minister for Information and Communication said that the decision of President Dr. Ram Baran Yadav to catapult the decision of the peoples’ elected government is a proof that the Monarchy in another form has already been revived.
Posted on : 2009-05-20 08:22:40Comments (3)
If monarchical institution was not existed in Nepal we could know what kind of person of Vaidya and your party leaders. Any way king was great for Maoist because if king was not behalf of people (Maoist) all of you smashed by military. That is why you and your party should restablish the monarchical institution. political parties have no right to use everything by themselves.
Most of political party leaders are frequently mentioning the 240 year old moanrchcal instituion that is why every political parties heart thinking monrchical institution was strong force but theythemselves cannot explore in society.Come what may monarchcial institution was great identity therefore New nepal actors could get good time like heaven. In conclusion monarchical institution should be revived as cultural and religious aspects. Still majority of people behalf of monarchical institution but in Nepal political party leaders are supremacy than people.
Post Your Comment
Got something to say, just fill the form and let us know.TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
Monarchy is a MUST in Nepal. without it Nepal will fall in the hands of wrong people. It is evident that more foreign intereference in the national issue of nepal is caused due to lack of Monarchy. Monarchy is strong, remember sonia gandhi not allowed in the pashupati temple, could these politicians take a step like that??