Telegraph Nepal
Talk of ‘Key to Nepali Sovereignty/Politics’ continues unabated. Madhav Nepal is the one who is quite interested to flare the debate. Election defeat advantage.
Mr. Nepal while addressing a program in Kathmandu, August 27, 2012, claimed in a bizarre manner that even during the so-called People’s Uprising-II (Aandolan 63/63) ‘key to Nepali politics’ was well within Nepal. Disgusting!
But the 12 point key wasn’t in NOIDA dear Mr. Nepal?
To recall, the uprising that Madhav Nepal refers to no doubt did away with the institution of monarchy but it had begun right after the seven party alliances signing of the 12 Point Agreement in New Delhi with the then terrorist declared Maoists under pressure from India, November 22, 2005. Coercion coincided with willing signing.That was really unfortunate.
It has become wide and clear now that the surrogate mother of Maoists rebellion was India itself, claim critics. S. D. Muni has already taken the load to certify this general Nepali claim.
The November 22, 2005 is an ghastly event which is considered as a voluntary surrender of ‘mother Nepal’ to ‘former British Colony’ by Nepal’s political actors. The Nepali Lendhups! Declaration though awaits.
“We were pressurized by four different countries to accept Baisakh 6, 2063 speech of the King. We out rightly refused,” said the United Marxist Leninist leader. He however, did not name those countries. But what about Indian Foreign Secretary’s Press meet in New Delhi that added fuel to the fire back in Kathmandu? Mr. Nepal must take this event also into proper account.
He adds, “A sitting prime minister has claimed that the key is somewhere else. He does not have right to continue occupy PM’s post.”
Madhav nepal is thus advised to read the fresh article penned by his former NOIDA colleague, Mr. S. D. Muni and then talk about the KEY.
TERMS OF USE:The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any persons) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).