Telegraph Nepal
Once again Nepal’s proven inefficient leaders; let’s take them as Mother Nepal’s burden, of the major political parts sat to resolve disputes over contentious constitutional issues, Friday March 23, 2012.
The meeting ended in mere ten minutes. Wasting time but inviting catastrophe.
By the way, Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal of Unified Maoists Party is the coordinator of the sub-committee to resolve disputes of the constitutional committee.
The meeting was presided over by Dahal and thus he went on with his regular hogwash.
Ram Chandra Poudel of the Nepali Congress who was sitting beside him looked quite uncomfortable. His uneasiness is understandable because of the ageing factor.
This is what Dahal had said:
“Since last two days we are holding serious dialogue. We are about to resolve all peace process related disputes.”
Pat replied Poudel:
“Where is the dialogue taking place? I am staying at home for the last two days. No one has informed me of any dialogue as such. What sort of dialogue? Where is it taking Place?”
In reply Dahal giggled as if nothing unusual happened.
“It’s amazing…amazing. Don’t say like that Poudel Ji.”
“Whom should we believe,” Poudel quietly commented and remained tight lipped as he had to.
The meeting thus ended without spelling the contentious issues even.
Prime Minister Baburam and Chair of Constitutional Committee Nilambar were also present.
12 point charisma. Some more childish entertainment remains in the pipeline.
TERMS OF USE:The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any persons) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).